drawn on the firm in their usual name and style be accepted by one of the partners all the partnership are bound. t results necessarily from the nature of the association and the objects for which it is constituted that each partner should possess the power to bind the whole partnership when acting in the common name ; although the consent of the other partners should not be obtained. hird persons are not bound to inquire whether the partner with whom they are dealing is contracting for the partnership or in reality for himself. e oy ayarddj o.v. ohnson eters here in the articles of partnership no name was agreed upon and the concern went into operation under the articles the books being kept and the bills and accounts relating to their transactions being made out at their warehouse in the name of offman & ohnson j it cannot be questioned but that a name thus assumed recognized and publicly used became the legitimate name and style of the firm ; not less so than if it had been adopted by the articles of partnership lb here a partner draw notes in the name of the firm payable to himself and then endorses them to a third party for a personal and not a partnership consideration the first endorsee if lie is aware of any fraud in their concoction cannot maintain an action upon them against the firm. mythv. trader et als. oward ut a second endorsee who receives them before maturity in the due course of business and without any knowledge of the circumstances of their execution may recover upon them notwithstanding the fraud. y forming a partnership the partners declare to the world that they are satisfied with the integrity and good faith of each other and impliedly undertake to be responsible for what they shall do in the partnership concern lb.in. here is no doubt that the liability of a deceased copartner as well as his interest in the profits of a concern may by contract be extended beyond his death; but without such stipulation even in the case of a copartnership for a term of years it is clear that the concern is dissolved by death. cholejieldv. ichelberger e Michael Kors Outlet embarked in the business. urwellv. andevilles xecutor oward ut the inconveniences arising from the former construction are so great that nothing bot the clearest indication of a positive intention on the part of the testator to make his general assets liable for debts contracted in the continuance of the trade after his death can justify the court in adopting it. t might suspend for an indefinite time the settlement of his estate and would indeed expose it to bankruptcy by the unlimited power over it which must be confided to his representative lb ut tbe executor of a deceased partner although authorized by his will to carry on the business after his death cannot do so without incurring a personal responsibility towards future creditors lb f one partner contracts with a third person in the name of the firm after dissolution but that fact not made public or known by such third person the law considers the contract as being made with the firm and upon their credit. ut if the partner deal with another in his individual name and upon his sole responsibility without even an allusion to the partnership it was unimportant to that other to know that the partnership was dissolved; since he was dealing not with the firm and upon their credit but with the individual with whom he was contracting and upon his credit. e oy ayard f o.v. ohnson eters here a bill of exchange was drawn byafter the dissolution of his partnership withand the proceeds of the bill went to pay and did pay the partnership debts of . andwhich . on the dissolution of the firm had assumed to pay; the holder of the bill after its dishonor can have no claim onin consequence of the particular appropriation of the proceeds of the bill. b. ne partner 18